Monday, March 10, 2014

The downfall of drones

CIA Director John Brennan speaks with OU President David Boren on February 26
PHOTO: Kendall Burchard 

By Kendall Burchard

 In his first public speaking engagement since becoming CIA director, John Brennan skillfully tip-toed around questions involving the CIA's speculated drone program in an informal discussion at the University of Oklahoma on February 26, 2014. Although charming, Brennan held fast to his speaking points and remained collected through tough audience questions.
“For the sake of argument, let’s say that the CIA has a drone program,” said Brennan to OU President David Boren, forcing a laugh from the skeptical audience. But not everyone was laughing. Yemen American student Saba Bingabr, a chemical bioscience sophomore, is no stranger to the dangers of drones. Bingabr moved to the U.S. a few years ago, and still travels back to Yemen each summer to visit her mother and family.
“Sometimes, when I go to Yemen and I hear airplanes in the air and I just freeze for a moment and I think, ‘Oh, my god, is it a drone, am I going to die?’” said Bingabr.
 Bingabr isn't the only one worried. The first reported targeted drone strike happened in early 2002, however, public opposition to drone programs did not manifest themselves until 2012. The American Civil Liberties Union stated their concern that an increase of the United States’ drone program would contribute to the creation of a surveillance society in the U.S. in December 2012. In December 2013, CBS released an announcement from the Federal Aviation Administration unveiling plans for the development of six testing sites for unmanned drones within the U.S.
 Expansion of the drone program has caused national protests. The late Ibrahim Mothana, Yemeni activist and New York Times opinion columnist, expressed his concerns in a June 2012 about the drone program contributing to an increase in al-Qaeda membership. Bingabr agreed.
“So I understand, yeah, we’ll kill the terrorists. So what? You killed two, three, terrorists, but in the end, you enrage thousands of people. When people become angry, they don’t have an outlet, they don’t have a future,” said Bingabr, “it’s just so easy for al-Qaeda.”
“Inadvertently, America creates terrorists,” said Bingabr.            
 According to Brennan, the benefits of drone technology outweigh the cost of soldiers on the ground due to the limited collateral damage. Drone strikes are only authorized if it is with “near certainty” a target has been located, and no force is to be taken unless there is a “continuing imminent threat to U.S. lives,” said Brennan.
“Presidents ask the CIA to do tough things. After 9/11, the CIA was asked to do some very tough things. But what we try to do is do what we have to do, make sure it is done lawfully, make sure it is done to the best of our ability,” said Brennan.
 Although the true implications and extent of unmanned drones is yet to be known, some information will at some time become declassified to the public.
“If John Brennan knows he’s going to answer to history someday, or David Boren knows he’s going to answer to history someday, there’s a better opportunity to do it the right way,” said Boren.
  Listen as Saba Bingabr expands on what it’s like to live in Yemen in the age of drones.
  AUDIO: Kendall Burchard, run time :37